Illustrative sample report. The property, scenarios, and findings below are fictional and demonstrate the report format. This is not a client evaluation.

Sample hospitality evaluation report

This is the format a management team receives after a Complete Guest Journey Evaluation. The property and every finding are fictional. The structure, the fields and the level of evidence are what a client report contains.

Request an assessment

Section 1 · Cover and engagement scope

Management report · Illustrative sample

Complete Guest Journey Evaluation

Illustrative Hotel

Service: Complete Guest Journey Evaluation
Property: Illustrative Hotel (fictional)
Digital booking: Mobile and desktop booking review, two booking scenarios
Inquiries: Three reservation inquiries across phone and email
Stay: Two-night guest stay, one evaluator
Follow-up: Post-stay communication observed for seven calendar days
Criteria: Illustrative assessment checkpoints
Engagement dates: Not shown. This sample has no real engagement
Overall score: Not used. Category statuses and action priorities replace a single score

Section 2 · Illustrative sample

Executive summary

The illustrative assessment identifies issues in booking clarity, pre-arrival information, and the consistency of guest-facing descriptions. The highest priorities are explaining cancellation conditions before room selection is finalized and correcting conflicting breakfast information. Management can address several communication issues through clearer booking content and reusable guest messages.

6 findingsAcross booking, inquiry, pre-arrival, arrival, stay and follow-up.
2 High priorityCancellation conditions in the booking path, and conflicting breakfast information.
3 Medium, 1 LowMostly guest messages that can be fixed with clearer templates.

Section 3 · Illustrative sample

Category overview

Category	Journey stage	Status	Finding
Digital booking	Choose and book	Improvement needed	DB-01
Reservation inquiries	Book	Improvement needed	RI-01
Pre-arrival communication	Arrive	Improvement needed	PI-01
Arrival and wayfinding	Arrive	Improvement needed	PE-01
Check-in	Arrive	Meets agreed criteria	None
Room and accommodation	Stay	Meets agreed criteria	None
Breakfast information	Stay	Material concern	GE-01
Service interactions	Stay	Meets agreed criteria	None
Departure and follow-up	Return	Improvement needed	FO-01
Spa and pool	Stay	Not observed	None
Loyalty program	Return	Not applicable	None

Meets agreed criteria
Improvement needed
Material concern
Not observed
Not applicable

Status describes what was observed against the agreed criteria. Priority, shown with each finding, describes how soon to act. The two are kept separate, and no overall percentage or hotel rating is produced.

Section 4 · Illustrative sample

Five most important actions

Display rate-specific cancellation conditions alongside the room and rate options.DB-01 · Booking · Website or booking-engine administratorHigh priority
Reconcile breakfast wording across the website, confirmation, and guest information.GE-01 · Stay · General manager with the marketing leadHigh priority
Add a concise parking explanation and a link to arrival directions.PI-01 · Pre-arrival · Reservations or guest communications leadMedium priority
Add relevant booking guidance and a direct reservation link to the response template.RI-01 · Inquiry · Reservations leadMedium priority
Add a clearly identified guest assistance contact to the departure message.FO-01 · Follow-up · Front office managerMedium priority

Section 5 · Illustrative sample

Findings by guest-journey stage

DB-01 · BookingImprovement neededHigh

Cancellation conditions appear only at the payment step

Observation: In the mobile booking scenario, the guest selects a room and rate before the cancellation conditions become visible. The conditions first appear on the final payment step.
Evidence: Screen sequence: rate selection view, then final payment view (Figure 1).

1 · Select a rate Flexible rateper night Advance rateper night No cancellation terms shown at this step Continue

2 · Payment Card detailsrequired Cancellation terms first appear here Confirm booking

Figure 1. Fictional interface diagram of the mobile booking sequence.
Criteria: Rate conditions are visible at the point where rates are compared.
Guest impact: A guest cannot easily compare the flexibility of available rates at the point of selection.
Business relevance: This creates avoidable uncertainty during the booking decision. Whether it affects abandonment would require the property’s analytics or further testing.
Recommended action: Put a short, rate-specific cancellation summary beside each rate choice and provide the full policy through an accessible detail control.
Suggested owner: Website or booking-engine administrator
Observation limit: This finding reflects one booking scenario. It does not establish the behavior of every booking path.

RI-01 · InquiryImprovement neededMedium

Email reply answers the question but offers no next step

Observation: An email response answers a room question. It omits availability guidance for the dates requested and offers no useful next step.
Evidence: Email correspondence and response timing note.
Criteria: Inquiry replies answer the question, address availability and offer a way to book.
Guest impact: The prospective guest has to write again, or start a booking alone, to learn if the room can be reserved.
Business relevance: An inquiry that ends without a next step is a missed chance to help the guest book. Conversion from inquiries was not measured.
Recommended action: Add relevant booking guidance and a direct reservation link to the response template.
Suggested owner: Reservations lead
Observation limit: One of three inquiry scenarios. The two phone scenarios did not show this pattern.

PI-01 · Pre-arrivalImprovement neededMedium

Confirmation omits the separate parking entrance

Observation: The confirmation email identifies the street address. It does not explain that guest parking is entered from a separate side street.
Evidence: Confirmation email and arrival timing note.
Criteria: Pre-arrival messages give a first-time guest enough to arrive without calling.
Guest impact: A first-time guest arriving by car reaches the front entrance with no indication of where to park.
Business relevance: Predictable arrival questions take front-desk time. How often they occur was not measured.
Recommended action: Add a concise parking explanation and a link to arrival directions.
Suggested owner: Reservations or guest communications lead
Observation limit: Arrival was by car on one evening. Other arrival modes were not tested.

PE-01 · ArrivalImprovement neededLow

Route from the parking area to the entrance is not signed

Observation: The public entrance is visible from the street. The route from the parking area to the entrance is not clearly signed.
Evidence: Arrival walk-through note.
Criteria: A guest can find the entrance from each arrival point without assistance.
Guest impact: A guest leaving the parking area chooses between two unmarked paths.
Business relevance: A minor first-impression issue that the directions recommended in PI-01 would also address.
Recommended action: Add simple directional information at the parking exit and in arrival instructions.
Suggested owner: Facilities or operations manager
Observation limit: Observed once, after dark.

GE-01 · StayMaterial concernHigh

Breakfast is described as included online and as a charge on property

Observation: The website describes breakfast as included. The booking confirmation and the in-room guest information both describe it as an additional charge.
Evidence: Website room page, confirmation email and in-room information card (Figure 2).

WebsiteBreakfast included with every stay.

Confirmation emailBreakfast: additional charge per guest.

In-room cardBreakfast is charged to your room.

Figure 2. Fictional excerpts from three places a guest reads about breakfast.
Criteria: Inclusions are described the same way wherever a guest reads them.
Guest impact: A guest who booked expecting breakfast learns of the charge after arrival.
Business relevance: Conflicting inclusions can lead to disputes at checkout. No dispute was observed during this stay.
Recommended action: Reconcile breakfast wording across the website, confirmation and guest information, and confirm which statement is correct for each rate.
Suggested owner: General manager with the marketing lead
Observation limit: One room type and one rate were booked. Other rates may be described differently.

FO-01 · Follow-upImprovement neededMedium

Departure message gives a receipt but no way to reach the property

Observation: The departure message provides a receipt. It gives no useful contact route for questions after the stay.
Evidence: Departure email.
Criteria: Post-stay messages tell a guest how to reach the property.
Guest impact: A guest with a billing question or a forgotten item has to search for a way to make contact.
Business relevance: The departure message is also a natural place to invite a return booking. No return prompt was observed.
Recommended action: Add a clearly identified guest assistance contact to the departure message.
Suggested owner: Front office manager
Observation limit: Observed for seven calendar days after checkout.

Section 6 · Illustrative sample

Evidence appendix

Figures 1 and 2 appear with their findings. The inquiry log below shows how the three reservation scenarios are recorded. A client report also carries the full screenshot set, correspondence and timing notes for the engagement.

Reservation inquiry log · illustrative

Scenario	Channel	Guest question	Response	Finding
S1	Phone	Accessible room for two nights	Answered on the first call. Clear answer and an offer to hold the room.	None
S2	Phone	Late arrival and where to park	Answered on the first call. Late check-in explained. Parking entrance not mentioned.	PI-01
S3	Email	Room size for a family of four	Reply received the next morning. Question answered. No availability guidance or next step.	RI-01

Section 7 · Illustrative sample

Action plan by priority

High priority

DB-01Put a short, rate-specific cancellation summary beside each rate choice and provide the full policy through an accessible detail control.Website or booking-engine administrator
GE-01Reconcile breakfast wording across the website, confirmation and guest information, and confirm which statement is correct for each rate.General manager with the marketing lead

Medium priority

PI-01Add a concise parking explanation and a link to arrival directions.Reservations or guest communications lead
RI-01Add relevant booking guidance and a direct reservation link to the response template.Reservations lead
FO-01Add a clearly identified guest assistance contact to the departure message.Front office manager

Low priority

PE-01Add simple directional information at the parking exit and in arrival instructions.Facilities or operations manager

Section 8 · Illustrative sample

Observation limits and unassessed items

One two-night stay by one evaluator. The report documents specific interactions and conditions. It does not establish how every guest is treated or how often an issue occurs.
Two agreed service interactions were observed: a breakfast visit and a guest information request.
Spa and pool were outside the agreed scope and were not observed.
No analytics or internal data were reviewed. Business relevance is a reasoned implication, not a measured financial impact.
The separate announced Property Experience Assessment was not part of this scope.

Illustrative sample report. The property, scenarios, and findings below are fictional and demonstrate the report format. This is not a client evaluation. Prepared in the Codified Hospitality report format.

Commission a report like this for your property.

Choose a focused evaluation or the complete guest journey. We follow up by email to confirm the scope, availability and fees.

Request an assessment